Independent review
My experience at FERGUS Carema Splash: a deeply disappointing stay.
The written review and a first photographic record are now published. Video documentation is in preparation.
This independent website documents my personal negative experience during a stay at FERGUS Carema Splash. It is not an official FERGUS website and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by FERGUS.
Read the complete written account and examine the photographic record below.
Written account published.
Review available below · further source material being organised · videos in preparation
Written review / first-person account
My experience during a one-week family stay.
This is my personal account of a one-week all-inclusive family stay. It describes what I observed, how it affected us and why the experience did not meet my expectations. It should not be read as a claim that every guest, room or period is the same.
Why we chose an all-inclusive stay
We booked a week on all-inclusive terms while travelling with young children. I chose this type of stay because I expected it to make meals, snacks and the daily routine simpler for the family.
My assessment is based on that expectation and on what happened during our own stay.
Slopes, stairs and our room location
Much of the accommodation and facilities are arranged across slopes and different levels. Reaching our room and moving between areas involved repeated hills and stairs. With a pushchair and young children, I found those journeys tiring and inconvenient.
Room location can change this experience, so this describes the route assigned to us rather than every unit at the hotel.
Food and the between-meal snack service
The main buffet offered more choice than the snack service. Between meals, the choices I personally saw were fountain drinks, ice cream served from tubs, hot dogs and chips. I did not see fresh fruit among the snack-bar options available to us.
This is not a claim that fruit was unavailable elsewhere at the hotel.
Meal times as I experienced them
At dinner, I observed food being cleared at around 21:30. Breakfast was presented to us as available until 10:30, but I saw clearing begin at about 10:15. With young children, I found those margins stressful rather than convenient.
These times are my recollection of what we experienced and may not represent the hotel’s current or year-round schedule.
Crowding and finding space
At busy times, the pool and dining areas felt crowded to us. We sometimes struggled to find loungers and seats together at meals. Queues and competition for space reduced the sense of ease I expected from an all-inclusive family holiday.
Occupancy changes, so other stays may be different.
Damp smell and light in our room
During our stay, I noticed a persistent damp smell in our room. This describes what I personally perceived; it is not a technical finding about its cause.
The curtains also did not block the light completely and we were unable to make the room properly dark. This mattered to us because we were travelling with young children and needed them to sleep.
Rooms appear to differ; this observation relates only to the room assigned to us.
What I photographed around the slides
During the stay I photographed the condition of parts of the water-play structures. The images below show visible rust-coloured corrosion on railings, posts, brackets and fixings; worn coatings; exposed or protruding metal pieces; dark deposits; staining; and material apparently secured with plastic cable ties.
I am describing what is visible, not making an engineering assessment or alleging a breach of a particular safety standard.
Other conditions I photographed in shared areas
Elsewhere during the stay, I photographed a tube-slide opening closed with barrier tape, heavy condensation on the glass of a food cabinet, used reusable cups collected in an open box, worn and darkened artificial turf beside a pool, a broken outdoor receptacle containing cigarette ends, and weathered timber with a protruding metal fastener.
These images document only what was visible when I took them. I do not know why the slide was closed, and I am not drawing a technical or hygiene conclusion from the photographs alone.
Photographic record / water-play area
What I observed around the slides.
These photographs were taken during my stay and show the condition I encountered around parts of the water-play structures.
I observed rust-coloured corrosion on metal railings, posts, brackets and fixings; worn or peeling coatings; protruding bracket ends and exposed seams that appeared sharp to me; and dirt, staining or dark deposits on some surfaces. On two photographed supports, pieces of material also appeared to be fastened to the metal brackets with plastic cable ties.
Rust-coloured corrosion visible across the entrance railings and upright posts.

Underside of the yellow slide, including its joint, coating and support.

Green-slide support bracket with a protruding metal end and dark material apparently fastened with a plastic cable tie.

Worn coating, rust-coloured staining and an exposed gap beside the themed structure.

Discoloration and rust-coloured deposits around a support base.

Blue-slide support frame with a protruding bracket end and dark staining.

Second angle showing dark material apparently fastened to the green-slide bracket with a plastic cable tie.

Dark deposits and worn coating visible beneath the orange slide.

Open-looking seam and worn coating at the joint of the yellow slide.

Green and dark staining visible on the platform surface beside the railings.
Photographic record / shared areas
Other visible conditions I photographed.
These additional photographs were taken during the same stay in the water-play, poolside and shared outdoor areas.
They show a tube-slide opening closed with barrier tape, condensation on a glass-fronted food cabinet, used reusable cups collected in an open box, visibly worn artificial turf at a pool edge, a broken outdoor receptacle with cigarette ends, and weathered timber with a projecting metal fastener.
Green tube-slide opening photographed closed off with red-and-white barrier tape; rust-coloured corrosion is visible on adjacent railings.

Heavy condensation visible on the glass of a food cabinet, obscuring much of the interior.

Used reusable cups and straws collected in an open wooden box next to a waste bin.

Darkened and visibly worn artificial turf beside the pool edge, with worn blue coating and a 0.35 m depth marker.

Broken outdoor receptacle with fragments, soil and cigarette ends visible on the surrounding walkway.

Weathered and cracked timber with a metal fastener projecting from the wooden barrier.
Public review platforms / third-party context
What other guests have published.
These ratings belong to independent review platforms. They are shown for broader context and remain separate from my personal account above.
Both public scores use a five-point scale. The star bars reproduce the same numerical values visually.
Critical or mixed themes
- Steep terrain, stairs and distant room locations are repeatedly mentioned, especially in relation to pushchairs or reduced mobility.
- Some guests describe crowding, queues or difficulty finding loungers and seating at busy times.
- Basic or dated rooms, maintenance, meal times, snack choice and value receive mixed assessments.
Selected critical reviews with sources
Photo-backed critical reviews are shown first. The summaries paraphrase specific public reviews and are included as attributed third-party references, not as proof of the claims they contain. Third-party photographs remain on the original platforms.
A May 2026 family review rated the stay 3/5 and included five photos. It described the room as clean but reported an unpleasant sewer smell throughout the stay and said this was the main reason the family would not book again.
Read the original reviewA July 2026 family review included six photos and reported a room about 15 minutes uphill from the main facilities, deteriorated artificial turf around the pool, hot painted flooring and limited shade at the beach.
Read the original reviewA July 2026 review rated the stay 1/5 and included ten photos. The reviewer described the property as old and neglected and alleged shortcomings involving hygiene, maintenance and broken tableware.
Read the original reviewA July 2026 review rated the stay 4/10, criticised the bedroom air conditioning and said the room, small balcony and minimally useful kitchenette did not match the reviewer’s four-star expectations.
Read the original reviewTwo Booking.com reviews published in May 2026, each scoring 5/10, criticised dated room furnishings and sofa-bed comfort; one also described food as often cold and the dining room as uncomfortable.
Read the original reviewA September 2025 family review rated the stay 1/6 and reported a sewer-like bathroom odour, a recurring air-conditioning problem and alleged maintenance defects in the splash-park pool and slide joints.
Read the original reviewDocumentation status
What is published and what is still being prepared.
03 / UPDATEDWritten review
The full first-person written account is published on this page.
Photographic documentation
Sixteen photographs from the stay are published with captions and explanatory context.
Video documentation
Original video material is still being reviewed and prepared for publication.